Zero Inductor Voltage Converter Topology with Improved Switch Utilization

ABSTRACT

A multi-stage, multi-level DC-DC step-down converter includes a first stage and a second stage having two identical cells connected in parallel. The first stage includes an input capacitor, four switches, and one flying capacitor. The two cells of the second stage each include four switches and one flying capacitor, and an output filter. The cells of the second stage are driven at half the switching frequency of the input stage, and provides a step-down ratio of 4:1. A third stage having four cells may be added to achieve a step-down ratio of 8:1, a fourth stage having eight cells may be added to achieve a step-down ration of 16:1, etc., each additional stage including a doubling of the number of cells connected in parallel, with all cells being substantially identical, and each stage operating at a further reduced fraction of the switching frequency. Embodiments are particularly suitable for applications such as a 48V intermediate bus architecture for servers and datacenters.

RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of the filing date of ApplicationNo. 62/733,942 filed on Sep. 20, 2018, the contents of which areincorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

FIELD

This invention relates generally to power converters. More specifically,the invention relates to zero inductor voltage DC-DC converters thatprovide voltage step-down ratios of 4:1, or greater, such as 8:1 or16:1, with high efficiency, reduced component count, and without theneed for complex control.

BACKGROUND

Datacenters and servers are among of the largest consumers of electricalpower today. Currently, the information and Communication Technology(ICT) sector consumes approximately 7% of the world's electricity, andthis number is projected to rise to 13% by 2030. With advances in cloudcomputing, and the massive expansion of the use of internet servicesworldwide, datacenters are expected to be one of the fastest growingconsumers of electricity within the ICT sector, increasing by up to 20%per year. In 2017 there were 8.4 billion “internet of things” connecteddevices. This is expected to rise to over 20 billion devices by 2020, asover 1 billion new internet users are expected to emerge during thattime, growing from 3 billion to over 4 billion.

Datacenter architecture has evolved over time, and significant gainshave been realized at the building level power conversion steps,however, most of the power loss still occurs at the server power supplyunit (PSU) and board-level voltage regulators.

Google's approach has been to implement a 48 volt power architecture. Inthis architecture the server PSU distributes 48 volts throughout theserver rack, which is then converted to the voltage required at thepoint of load (POL). Google has estimated that this change can reduceconversion losses 30%, as well as offering a 16× reduction indistribution losses throughout the rack (X. Li and S. Jiang. “Google 48VPower Architecture”, presented at the 2017 IEEE Applied PowerElectronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Tampa, Fla., USA, 2017).Overall this has the potential to greatly reduce cost and improve bothefficiency and flexibility. However, the 48 volt to POL conversion canbe very challenging, particularly for low voltage high current loadssuch as modern processors. For a conventional buck converter, theinductance value required for the output filter is directly proportionalto the voltage step-down ratio. Therefore, increasing the step-downratio, such as in 48V to 1V applications, results in an extremely largeinductor requirement, resulting in a very bulky, inefficient converterusing conventional single-stage techniques.

The most common approach is to utilize a two-stage conversion approach,such as the intermediate Bus Architecture, to achieve this stepdown athigh efficiency. Such techniques utilize a bus converter to reduce thevoltage by some fixed ratio near the point of load, reducing thestep-down requirement for the point of load converter, allowing it toachieve improved performance.

SUMMARY

Described herein are multi-stage, multi-level DC-DC step-down convertersbased on a zero inductor voltage converter that achieve superiorutilization of the first stage switches and flying capacitor, while alsoachieving interleaving on the input capacitor. Embodiments may include afirst stage, which is the input stage, and a second stage having twoidentical cells connected in parallel. The first stage includes an inputcapacitor, four switches, and one flying capacitor. The two cells of thesecond stage each include four switches and one flying capacitor, and anoutput filter (e.g., an inductor-capacitor filter). The cells of thesecond stage are driven at half the switching frequency of the inputstage. Such an embodiment achieves a step-down ratio of 4:1. In otherembodiments a third stage may be added to achieve a step-down ratio of8:1, a fourth stage may be added to achieve a step-down ration of 16:1,etc., each additional stage including a doubling of the number of cellsconnected in parallel, with all cells being substantially identical(i.e., each cell including four switches and one flying capacitor,before the output LC filter), and each stage operating at a furtherreduced fraction of the switching frequency. Thus, by adding additionalstages, the embodiments can achieve 2^(n):1 stepdown, wherein n is thestage number. Embodiments are particularly suitable for applicationssuch as a 48V intermediate bus architecture for servers and datacenters.Compared with previous designs, the embodiments described herein achievehigher efficiency and superior power density, and low component count,without the need for complex control or sensitive resonant based design.

According to one aspect of the invention there is provided a DC-DCconverter, comprising: first and second input terminals for receiving aninput DC voltage, the second input terminal connected to a circuitcommon point; a first stage comprising first, second, third, and fourthswitches connected together in series between the first and second inputterminals, a first flying capacitor connected in parallel with thesecond and third switches, and a first stage output point between thesecond and third switches; a second stage connected to the first stageoutput point, the second stage comprising first and second cellsconnected together in parallel; wherein each cell comprises first,second, third, and fourth switches connected together in series betweenan input terminal and a circuit common point, a flying capacitorconnected in parallel with the second and third switches, and an outputpoint between the second and third switches; an output filter connectedto output points of the first and second cells; wherein an outputvoltage of the DC-DC converter is about 0.25× the input voltage.

In various embodiments the DC-DC converter may comprise a controllerthat provides switching signals to the switches of the first and secondstages.

In one embodiment, a switching frequency provided to the second stageswitches is half the switching frequency provided to the first stageswitches.

In one embodiment, the first stage switching signals provided to thefirst and third switches are 180 degrees out of phase with the switchingsignals provided to the second and fourth switches; and for each of thefirst and second cells, the switching signals provided to first andthird switches are 180 degrees out of phase with the switching signalsprovided to the second and fourth switches; and the first and secondcells are operated 180 degrees out of phase with each other.

In one embodiment, the first stage comprises an input capacitorconnected between the first and second input terminals.

In various embodiments, the switches may be IGBTs with parallel diodesor MOSFETs.

In one embodiment, there is provided a third stage connected to theoutput points of the cells of the second stage; wherein the third stagecomprises four cells connected together in parallel; wherein each cellcomprises first, second, third, and fourth switches connected togetherin series between an input terminal and a circuit common point, a flyingcapacitor connected in parallel with the second and third switches, andan output point between the second and third switches; wherein theoutput filter is connected to output points of the four cells of thethird stage; wherein an output voltage of the DC-DC converter is about0.125× the input voltage.

Such an embodiment may comprise a controller that provides switchingsignals to the switches of the first, second, and third stages; whereina switching frequency provided to the third stage switches is half theswitching frequency provided to the second stage switches; wherein aswitching frequency provided to the second stage switches is half theswitching frequency provided to the first stage switches.

In one embodiment, the converter is implemented in a power supplyarchitecture with point of load (POL) voltage conversion.

In one embodiment, the input DC voltage is about 48 V.

Another aspect of the invention provides a method for implementing aDC-DC converter, comprising: providing a first stage that receives aninput DC voltage, the first stage comprising first, second, third, andfourth switches connected together in series between the first andsecond input terminals, a first flying capacitor connected in parallelwith the second and third switches, and a first stage output pointbetween the second and third switches; providing a second stageconnected to the first stage output point, the second stage comprisingfirst and second cells connected together in parallel, wherein each cellcomprises first, second, third, and fourth switches connected togetherin series between an input terminal and a circuit common point, a flyingcapacitor connected in parallel with the second and third switches, andan output point between the second and third switches; controlling theswitches of the first and second stages, wherein a switching frequencyprovided to the second stage switches is half a switching frequencyprovided to the first stage switches; wherein an output voltage of theDC-DC converter is about 0.25× the input voltage.

In one embodiment, first stage switching signals provided to the firstand third switches are 180 degrees out of phase with switching signalsprovided to the second and fourth switches; and for each of the firstand second cells, switching signals provided to first and third switchesare 180 degrees out of phase with switching signals provided to thesecond and fourth switches; and the first and second cells are operated180 degrees out of phase with each other.

In one embodiment, the method comprises providing a third stageconnected to the output points of the cells of the second stage; whereinthe third stage comprises four cells connected together in parallel, andeach cell comprises first, second, third, and fourth switches connectedtogether in series between an input terminal and a circuit common point,a flying capacitor connected in parallel with the second and thirdswitches, and an output point between the second and third switches;controlling the switches of the first, second, and third stages, whereina switching frequency provided to the third stage switches is half theswitching frequency provided to the second stage switches, and theswitching frequency provided to the second stage switches is half theswitching frequency provided to the first stage switches; wherein anoutput voltage of the DC-DC converter is about 0.125× the input voltage.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a better understanding of the invention, and to show more clearlyhow it may be carried into effect, embodiments will be described, by wayof example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram of a 7-switch zero inductor voltage (ZIV)converter, according to the prior art.

FIG. 1B is a pulse width modulation (PWM) timing diagram for the7-switch ZIV converter of FIG. 1A, according to the prior art.

FIGS. 2-4 are circuit diagrams showing States A, B, and C, respectively,of the 7-switch ZIV converter of FIG. 1A, wherein portions of thecircuits shown in dashed lines do not operate during respective States,according to the prior art.

FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the input capacitor current waveform for the7-switch ZIV converter of FIG. 1A, according to the prior art.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing the input capacitor current waveform with50% duty cycle interleaving, for a two-phase 7-switch ZIV converter, andfor a 12-switch ZIV converter as described herein.

FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a two-phase 7-switch ZIV converter,according to the prior art.

FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of a 12-switch ZIV converter, according toone embodiment.

FIG. 9 is a diagram showing PWM timing and current waveforms for the12-switch ZIV converter of FIG. 8, according to one embodiment.

FIGS. 10-13 are circuit diagrams showing States A, B, C, and Drespectively, of the 12-switch ZIV converter of FIG. 8, wherein portionsof the circuits shown in dashed lines do not operate during respectiveStates, according to one embodiment.

FIGS. 14A-14C are circuit diagrams showing equivalent circuits of the12-switch ZIV converter during operating states I-IV.

FIGS. 15 and 16 are oscilloscope screen shots showing operatingwaveforms obtained for a prototype 12-switch ZIV converter, according toone embodiment.

FIG. 17 is a circuit diagram of a two-phase 12-switch ZIV converter,according to one embodiment.

FIG. 18 is a circuit diagram of an 8:1 converter based on a 12-switchZIV converter topology, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 19 is a PWM gate timing diagram for an 8:1 converter based on a12-switch ZIV converter topology, according to one embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

As used herein, the term “switch” is intended to refer to asemiconductor transistor device which can block current flow in onedirection when turned off, such as an insulated gate bipolar transistor(IGBT) with a parallel diode, or a MOSFET where the parallel diode isinherent.

The conventional 7-switch zero inductor voltage (ZIV) converter operatesusing seven switches as shown in FIG. 1A. The PWM scheme for thisconverter is shown in FIG. 18. This PWM scheme results in threeoperating states for the converter, shown in FIGS. 2-4. In State A,switches M1, M3, and M6 are turned on with the remaining switches turnedoff. Both flying capacitors are charging in this state. The converterequivalent circuit for State A is shown in FIG. 14A, and the inductorvoltage is represented by Equation 11. This state lasts for 25% of theoverall switching period.

In State B switches M2, M4, and M6 are turned on, with the remainingswitches turned off. The first stage flying capacitor is nowdischarging, while the second stage flying capacitor continues tocharge. The converter equivalent circuit for State B is represented inFIG. 148, and the inductor voltage is represented by Equation 12. Thisstate lasts for 25% of the overall switching period.

In State C switches M5 and M7 are turned on, with the remaining switchesturned off. The second stage flying capacitor is now discharging. Theconverter equivalent circuit for State C is represented in FIG. 14C, andthe inductor voltage is represented by Equation 13.

The 7-switch ZIV converter achieves 4:1 stepdown, as shown by Equation17, and provides an unregulated output voltage. In order to increase thepower handling capability, it can be desirable and is a well-knowntechnique to parallel multiple “phases” of the converter. A two-phase7-switch ZIV converter is shown in FIG. 7. The key reason for doing thisis to achieve higher output current for the same efficiency level byutilizing multiple phases, however, an additional advantage can berealized by using two or more phases in a ZIV converter, withinterleaving of the input capacitor. In a 7-switch ZIV converter M1operates with 25% duty cycle, the input capacitor RMS current is givenby:

$\begin{matrix}{I_{cRMS} = {\sqrt{\left( {\frac{3}{4}I_{out}\sqrt{0.25}} \right)^{2} + \left( {\frac{1}{4}I_{out}\sqrt{0.75}} \right)^{2}} = {\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}I_{out}}}} & (1)\end{matrix}$

FIG. 5 shows the input capacitor current waveform for the 7-switch ZIVconverter.

For a two-phase 7-switch ZIV converter, as shown in FIG. 7, the inputcapacitor RMS current can be significantly reduced if the two phases areoperated 180 degrees out of phase. Due to this interleaving, the inputcapacitor current becomes a square wave with an amplitude of ¼ of theoutput current, alternating between discharging at ¼ of the outputcurrent for 25% of a converter switching period, charging at ¼ of theoutput current for the next 25% of a converter switching period, thenagain discharging and charging for the remainder of the switchingperiod, as shown in FIG. 6. This can be understood by examining how theinput capacitor must make up the difference between the current drawnfrom the input supply, and the output current. For a 4:1 stepdown, thecurrent drawn from the input supply is approximately ¼ of the loadcurrent. Therefore, for two phase operation, the input capacitor mustsupply the additional ¼ of the load current to cause ½ of the loadcurrent to flow through the first phase (note that for two-phaseoperation only one phase will be drawing energy from the input supply atany one time). After 25% of the duty cycle, M1 for the first phase willturn off, and the capacitor will now be charged by the ¼ of the loadcurrent from the input supply for the next 25% of the switching period.Next, M1 for the second phase will turn on. In this case the inputcapacitor must once again supply the ¼ of the load current not providedby the input supply for 25% of the switching period. The input capacitorwill then be charged at ¼ of the load current for the remaining 25% ofthe switching period.

In this way, the RMS current for a two-phase 7-switch ZIV converterbecomes:

$\begin{matrix}{I_{{cRMS}{({2 - {Phase}})}} = {\frac{1}{4}I_{out}}} & (2)\end{matrix}$

Therefore, achieving interleaving reduces the input capacitor ESR lossesby a factor of 3 for the two-phase 7-switch ZIV converter, in additionto achieving higher output current capability.

In the standard 7-switch ZIV converter topology the first-stage switches(M1-M4) operate with only 25% duty cycle. This causes relatively largeRMS current stress through the MOSFETs, input capacitor, and first stageflying capacitor. In the two-phase 7-switch ZiV converter theinterleaving on the input capacitor has an “apparent” 50% duty cycle,but the MOSFETs and flying capacitors still operate at only 25% dutycycle.

A 12-switch ZIV converter as described herein incorporates features ofthe 7-switch ZIV converter, but provides considerable improvements inperformance and switch utilization. An embodiment is shown in FIG. 8,and a PWM gate timing diagram for this embodiment is shown in FIG. 9.According to this embodiment, a 12-switch ZIV converter has an input orfirst stage including four switches and a flying capacitor, an outputpoint “Node 1”, and a second stage including two cells 81, 82, shownwithin dashed lines, in parallel, wherein each cell includes fourswitches, a flying capacitor, and an output point. In the embodiment ofFIG. 8, the first cell 81 has switches M5-M8, and the second cell 82 hasswitches Q5-Q8. This results in significant component savings and sizereduction compared to a two-phase 7-switch ZIV converter with 14switches, while also offering greatly improved efficiency when comparedwith a single-phase 7-switch ZIV converter.

Operation of this embodiment, and realization of the componentreduction, may be understood by examining the two-phase 7-Switch ZIVconverter, shown in FIG. 7, with each phase operating in parallel with a180 degree phase shift between them. Note that in this standardtwo-phase topology, each phase has a first stage with switches M1-M4,and the first stage switches M1-M4 will be inactive for 50% of the totalconverter cycle during State C (for both phases), as shown in FIG. 7.

Instead of having two first stages each operating for only 50% of thetotal cycle, a 12-switch ZIV converter as described herein has only asingle first stage, as can be seen in the embodiment of FIG. 8. Thesingle first stage is driven at double the frequency (compared to thetwo-phase 7-switch ZIV converter). When one of the second phase cellsenters State C, the additional MOSFET M5 or Q5 blocks the voltage atNode 1 from being pulled down to the output voltage. This allows asingle input stage to function for both parallel second stage cells, asthe second stage cells are effectively separated by the additionalblocking MOSFETs. It is noteworthy that this component count reductioncan be achieved without a significant penalty.

To verify the performance of the embodiment of FIG. 8, the analysisbelow evaluates the RMS current stress of each component for the7-switch ZIV converter topology, the two-phase 7-switch ZIV convertertopology, and the 12-switch ZIV converter topology for the same outputcurrent. Note that the analysis below corresponds to the currentwaveforms shown in FIG. 18 and FIG. 9 for the 7-switch ZIV converter and12-switch ZIV converter, respectively. For clarity, the currentwaveforms for the 12-switch ZIV converter in FIG. 9 are shown for onlythe first phase involving M1-M4 and M5-M8, as the second phase involvingM1-M4 and Q5-Q8 will have the same current stress, but phase shifted;that is, the operation of the second stage second cell 82 (Q5-Q8) is thesame as the second stage first cell 81 (M5-M8), but it is phase shiftedby 180 degrees. It should also be noted that for the two-phase 7-switchZIV converter the current waveforms are identical to the 7-switch ZIVconverter, with each phase carrying half of the output current and phaseshifted 180 degrees relative to each other; therefore, a correspondingfigure is not provided. This is reflected in the analysis below; the RMScurrent stress for each component in the two-phase 7-switch ZIVconverter is half of the stress for that component in the 7-switch ZIVconverter.

Considering the first stage MOSFETs of a 7-switch ZIV converter thetotal RMS current stress for each MOSFET is given by:

$\begin{matrix}{I_{{RMS}{({{M\; 1} - {M\; 4}})}} = {{\sqrt{0.25}I_{out}} = \frac{I_{out}}{2}}} & (3)\end{matrix}$

For the first stage flying capacitor, and the second stage MOSFETsM5-M7, the RMS current stress is given by:

$\begin{matrix}{I_{{RMS}{({{{FC}\; 1},{{M\; 5} - {M\; 7}}})}} = {{\sqrt{0.5}I_{out}} = {\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}I_{out}}}} & (4)\end{matrix}$

For the second stage flying capacitor:

I _(RMS(FCZ)) =I _(out)  (5)

For the two-phase 7-switch ZIV converter the current is evenly sharedbetween each phase, therefore for the first stage MOSFETs:

$\begin{matrix}{I_{{RMS}{({{M\; 1} - {M\; 4}})}} = {{\sqrt{0.25}\frac{I_{out}}{2}} = \frac{I_{out}}{4}}} & (6)\end{matrix}$

For the first stage flying capacitor, and the second stage MOSFETsM5-M7, the RMS current stress will be given by:

$\begin{matrix}{I_{{RMS}{({{{FC}\; 1},{{M\; 5} - {M\; 7}}})}} = {{\sqrt{0.5}\frac{I_{out}}{2}} = {\frac{\sqrt{2}}{4}I_{out}}}} & (7)\end{matrix}$

For the second stage flying capacitor:

$\begin{matrix}{I_{{RMS}{({{FC}\; 2})}} = \frac{I_{out}}{2}} & (8)\end{matrix}$

In the twelve-switch ZIV converter the first stage MOSFETs operate at50% duty cycle, and carry half of the load current for a given onperiod:

$\begin{matrix}{I_{{RMS}{({{M\; 1} - {M\; 4}})}} = {\frac{\sqrt{0.5}I_{out}}{2} = {\frac{\sqrt{2}}{4}I_{out}}}} & (9)\end{matrix}$

The first stage flying capacitor operates at 100% duty cycle, chargingand discharging at half of the load current for each time:

$\begin{matrix}{I_{{RMS}{({{FC}\; 1})}} = \frac{I_{out}}{2}} & (10)\end{matrix}$

In the 12-switch ZIV converter the second stage MOSFETs and flyingcapacitors operate in the same way as the two-phase 7-switch ZIVconverter, and the RMS current for each component is the same as inequations 7 and 8.

In summary, compared with a single phase ZIV converter, the totalconduction loss in the first stage for the 12-switch ZIV converter isreduced by a factor of 2 for the same output current, despite not addingany additional components. The RMS current stress of each MOSFET in thesecond stage, and the second stage flying capacitors, is also reduced tohalf due to the current sharing, as in a two-phase 7-switch topology.This offers a significant performance improvement over a single phase7-switch ZIV converter, without requiring a doubling of the componentcount such as in a two-phase 7-switch ZiV converter. The switching lossfor MOSFETs M1-M4 in the 12-switch ZIV converter is the same as a7-switch ZIV converter for the same output load. This is because whilethe switching frequency is doubled, the current at the time of switchingis halved. The increased frequency also reduces the flying capacitorripple in the first stage by a factor of 2. The 50% duty cycle operationof the 12-switch ZIV converter also significantly reduces the inputcapacitor RMS current, compared to a 7-switch ZIV converter. Theinterleaving achieved by the 12-switch ZIV converter is the same as thetwo-phase 7-switch ZIV converter; therefore, the input capacitor loss isreduced by a factor of 3 compared with a 7-switch ZIV converter.

As compared with a two-phase 7-switch ZIV converter, the totalconduction loss through all the first stage MOSFETs and capacitors willbe the same in both the two-phase 7-switch ZIV converter and in the12-switch ZIV converter. This is because while the two-phase 7-switchZIV converter has a lower RMS current through each individual MOSFET,the number of first stage MOSFETs is doubled, due to poor switchutilization, meaning the total loss will be the same. While the currentstress of the individual second stage components is the same in the12-switch ZIV converter and the two-phase 7-switch ZIV converter, the12-switch ZIV converter will have slightly increased losses whencompared with the two-phase 7-switch ZIV converter, due to the additionof MOSFETs M5 and Q5 required to block the voltage at Node 1 from beingpulled down to the output voltage. However, this will result in onlyslightly increased loss, with the advantage of a significantly reducedcomponent count (2 fewer MOSFETs and associated driving circuitry and 1fewer flying capacitor).

Operation

Operation of the embodiment of the 12-switch ZIV converter shown in FIG.8 will now be described in greater detail with reference to FIGS. 9-13.The embodiment operates in four states, labelled I, II, III, and IV asshown in FIG. 9. FIGS. 10-13 show the current path through the circuitfor each operating state; wherein portions of the circuit that do notoperate during each state are shown in dashed lines. Each of theoperating states can be represented by one of the equivalent circuits ofFIGS. 14A-14C.

To explain the operation of the 12-switch ZIV converter, the first“phase” involving only M1-M8 will be considered first. For states I andII, for the phase involving M1-M8, the operation is equivalent to theoperation of the 7-switch ZIV converter in FIG. 2 for the first 25% ofthe duty cycle, and equivalent to the operation in FIG. 3 for the second25% of the duty cycle. Thus, the equivalent circuits are shown in FIG.14A for the first 25% of the duty cycle, and in FIG. 14B for the 2^(nd)25% of the duty cycle. The inductor voltages for these states are:

V _(LA) =V _(in) −V _(cf1-A) −V _(cf2-A) −V _(out)  (11)

V _(LB) =V _(cf1-B) −V _(cf2-B) −V _(out)  (12)

For states III and IV for the first phase involving M5-M8 the operationis equivalent to the operation of the 7-switch ZIV converter shown inFIG. 4 for the remaining 50% of the duty cycle. Thus, the equivalentcircuit for this state is shown in FIG. 14C. The inductor voltage forstates II and IV is:

V _(LC) =V _(cf2-C) −V _(out)  (13)

The average inductor voltage for the first phase involving M1-M8 canthus be represented as follows:

$\begin{matrix}{V_{L} = {\frac{V_{in}}{4} - \left( {\frac{V_{{c\; f\; 1} - A}}{4} + \frac{V_{{c\; f\; 2} - B}}{4}} \right) - \left( {\frac{V_{{c\; f\; 2} - A}}{4} - \frac{V_{{c\; f\; 2} - B}}{4} + \frac{V_{{c\; f\; 2} - C}}{2}} \right) - V_{out}}} & (14)\end{matrix}$

Note that the capacitor balance must also be maintained for steady stateoperation. This means that the average voltage of C_(f1) for state Imust be equal to the average voltage of C_(f1) for state II, and theaverage of C_(f2) across both state I and state II must be equal to theaverage voltage of C_(f2) across state III/IV. Thus, the equation may besimplified by noting the following:

$\begin{matrix}{V_{{c\; f\; 1} - A} = V_{{c\; f\; 2} - B}} & (15) \\{\frac{V_{{c\; f\; 2} - A} + V_{{c\; f\; 2} - B}}{2} = V_{{c\; f\; 2} - C}} & (16)\end{matrix}$

Under steady state operation the inductor voltage must equal to zero,and as all the capacitor voltage terms cancel out with the abovesubstitutions, there is:

$\begin{matrix}{V_{out} = \frac{V_{in}}{4}} & (17)\end{matrix}$

Thus, the 12-switch ZIV converter as shown in the embodiment of FIG. 8achieves 4:1 voltage step down. The second phase involving M1-M4 andQ5-Q8 operates in a symmetrical way, phase shifted 180 degrees relativeto the first phase. M5 and Q5 block the voltage at Node 1 from beingpulled down to the output voltage. Therefore the two second stage cells81 including M5 to M8 and 82 including Q5 to Q8 are separated: while onephase operates in State C (FIG. 14C) with only the second flyingcapacitor discharging, the other phase operates in States A and B (FIG.14A and FIG. 148) where the input stage Is involved. The second phaseinvolving M1-M4 and Q5-Q8 can be represented by the same equivalentcircuits (FIGS. 14A-14C) and is governed by the same equations(Equations 11-17). Therefore, it is clear that 4:1 step-down operationis achieved by the 12-switch ZIV topology.

Advantages of the topology over the single phase 7-switch ZIV converterare also highlighted when examining the operation of both phases as awhole; that is, the converter has a much better utilization of switchesM1-M4 by operating at 50% duty cycle for these switches, and a muchbetter utilization of C_(f1) which now operates at 100% duty cycle.Additionally, the 50% duty cycle for the first stage switches M1-M4provides interleaving on the input capacitor, reducing the associatedRMS loss by a factor of 3. The 12-switch ZIV converter also possessesthe same benefit of current sharing between two phases as the two-phase7-switch ZIV converter; this greatly increases the current handlingcapability of the converter compared to a single phase design allowingfor improved efficiency to be achieved even if the output current isdoubled. Overall, this results in significant performance increasecompared with a 7-switch ZIV converter, while also offering a componentcount reduction compared to a true two-phase 7-switch ZIV converter byallowing for the elimination of two switches (and associated drivercircuitry) and one flying capacitor.

An experimental prototype of a 12-switch ZIV converter was constructedbased on the embodiment of FIG. 8, using the components and parameterslisted in Table 1, with a load current of 30 A, an input voltage of 48V,and a switching frequency of 120 kHz for M1-M4 and 60 kHz for M5-M8 andQ5-Q8. FIG. 15 is an oscilloscope screen shot that shows the Node 1voltage waveform as well as the input and output voltage waveforms ofthe experimental prototype. FIG. 16 is an oscilloscope screen shot thatshows the C_(f2) and C_(f3) capacitor ripple voltages. The waveformsverify that current is shared evenly between the phases, as the flyingcapacitor ripple is proportional to the output current of each phase,and 4:1 stepdown operation is achieved as suggested by the aboveanalysis.

TABLE 1 12 Switch ZIV Converter Prototype Parameters C_(in) 15 × 4.7 uF100 V X7S 1210 C_(f1) 16 × 10 uF 50 V JB 1206 C_(f2), C_(f3) 9 × 47 uF25 V XSR 1210 C_(out) 12 × 47 uF 25 V X5R 1210 L1, L2 230 nHSLR1075-231KE M1-M4 30 V BSC011N03LSI M5-M8, Q5-Q8 25 V BSC009NE2LSSISwitching Frequency 120 kHz (M1-M4) 60 kHz (M5-M8, Q5-Q8) Input Voltage48 V Output Current 70 A (Maximum)

Two-Phase 12-Switch ZIV Converter

A two-phase 12-switch ZIV converter is shown in FIG. 17. This extensionof the 12-switch ZIV converter is noteworthy due to the interleavingthat it can achieve on the input power supply. As noted earlier, the ESRloss of the input capacitor can be significantly reduced by using the12-switch ZIV converter, as the input capacitor now operates with a 50%duty cycle. With a two-phase 12-switch ZIV converter M1-1 will be activefor 50% of the duty cycle, and, if the second converter is phase shiftedby 180 degrees, M1-2 will be active for the remaining 50% of the dutycycle. In this way, the requirement for the input capacitor is reducedto virtually zero as the input power supply is always able to directlydeliver power to one of the phases, with no need for a storagecapacitor. It is noted that in a practical implementation a smallcapacitor may still be utilized, due to considerations such as deadtime,but the current stress of this capacitor, and by extension the loss,will be negligible, enabling a far smaller capacitor to be used.

Generalized 2^(n) ZIV Converter

In various embodiments, a 12-switch ZIV converter topology may beimplemented to provide higher step-down ratios such as 8:1 or 16:1through the addition of more stages.

An example of an 8:1 ZIV converter topology utilizing the 12-switch ZIVtopology is shown in FIG. 18. The PWM gate timing diagram is shown inFIG. 19. In this converter the first input stage (M1-M4) is unchanged,along with the second stage of two paralleled cells including M5-M8 andQ5-Q8. However, a third or output stage of four cells is added beforethe output LC filter. The cells are like those of FIG. 8, but in FIG. 19they are not shown enclosed within dashed lines for clarity. Each of thefour cells of the third stage includes four switches and a flyingcapacitor. The third or output stage operates at ¼ of the switchingfrequency of the input stage, in order to maintain 50% duty cycleoperation on every MOSFET, and 100% duty cycle on every flyingcapacitor, and provide an additional 2:1 step-down, resulting in anoverall step-down ratio of 8:1. This is a significant advantage as theswitch utilization for a standard 8:1 topology based on the 7-switch ZIVconverter would have poorer switch utilization than the 4:1 7-switch ZIVconverter; the first stage MOSFETs M1-M4 would have to operate at only12.5% duty cycle, and the second stage MOSFETs M5-M8 would be reduced to25% duty cycle. Therefore, it would not be practical to extend the7-switch ZIV converter topology to step-down ratios greater than 4:1. Incontrast, the general topology based on the 12-switch ZiV converter doesnot have this limitation.

Further output stages could continue to be added, with each additionalstage providing an additional 2:1 stepdown ratio, requiring twice asmany cells as the previous stage, and operating at half the switchingfrequency of the previous stage. Regardless of how many stages areadded, the core operating principles remain the same. Due to the “top”or first switch of each cell (M5, Q5, M9, Q9, M13, Q13, etc.; see FIG.19), each cell can be isolated from the bus nodes that connect theparallel cells together. This means each cell can be charged similar toState A and State B (FIG. 14A and FIG. 148) and then can discharge inState C (FIG. 14C) without affecting the operation of other cells. Theconverter operation is straight-forward, as each phase can be analyzedindependently using the same techniques as the single-phase ZIVconverter. Additional phases are phase-shifted and operate using thesame fundamental principles, and the same equivalent circuits.

All cited publications are incorporated herein by reference in theirentirety.

EQUIVALENTS

While the invention has been described with respect to illustrativeembodiments thereof, it will be understood that various changes may bemade to the embodiments without departing from the scope of theinvention. Accordingly, the described embodiments are to be consideredexemplary and the invention is not to be limited thereby.

1. A DC-DC converter, comprising: first and second input terminals forreceiving an input DC voltage, the second input terminal connected to acircuit common point; a first stage comprising first, second, third, andfourth switches connected together in series between the first andsecond input terminals, a first flying capacitor connected in parallelwith the second and third switches, and a first stage output pointbetween the second and third switches; a second stage connected to thefirst stage output point, the second stage comprising first and secondcells connected together in parallel; wherein each cell comprises first,second, third, and fourth switches connected together in series betweenan input terminal and a circuit common point, a flying capacitorconnected in parallel with the second and third switches, and an outputpoint between the second and third switches; an output filter connectedto output points of the first and second cells; wherein an outputvoltage of the DC-DC converter is about 0.25× the input voltage.
 2. TheDC-DC converter of claim 1, comprising a controller that providesswitching signals to the switches of the first and second stages.
 3. TheDC-DC converter of claim 2, wherein a switching frequency provided tothe second stage switches is half the switching frequency provided tothe first stage switches.
 4. The DC-DC converter of claim 3, wherein thefirst stage switching signals provided to the first and third switchesare 180 degrees out of phase with the switching signals provided to thesecond and fourth switches; and for each of the first and second cells,the switching signals provided to first and third switches are 180degrees out of phase with the switching signals provided to the secondand fourth switches; and the first and second cells are operated 180degrees out of phase with each other.
 5. The DC-DC converter of claim 1,wherein the first stage comprises an input capacitor connected betweenthe first and second input terminals.
 6. The DC-DC converter of claim 1,wherein the switches are IGBTs with parallel diodes or MOSFETs.
 7. TheDC-DC converter of claim 1, comprising a third stage connected to theoutput points of the cells of the second stage; wherein the third stagecomprises four cells connected together in parallel; wherein each cellcomprises first, second, third, and fourth switches connected togetherin series between an input terminal and a circuit common point, a flyingcapacitor connected in parallel with the second and third switches, andan output point between the second and third switches; wherein theoutput filter is connected to output points of the four cells of thethird stage; wherein an output voltage of the DC-DC converter is about0.125× the input voltage.
 8. The DC-DC converter of claim 7, comprisinga controller that provides switching signals to the switches of thefirst, second, and third stages; wherein a switching frequency providedto the third stage switches is half the switching frequency provided tothe second stage switches; wherein a switching frequency provided to thesecond stage switches is half the switching frequency provided to thefirst stage switches.
 9. The DC-DC converter of claim 1, comprising noutput stages, wherein each subsequent stage provides an additional 2:1stepdown ratio, includes twice as many cells as a previous stage, andoperates at half the switching frequency of a previous stage; wherein astepdown ratio of 2^(n):1 is provided.
 10. The DC-DC converter of claim1, wherein the converter is implemented in a power supply architecturewith point of load (POL) voltage conversion.
 11. The DC-DC converter ofclaim 1, wherein the input DC voltage is about 48 V.
 12. A method forimplementing a DC-DC converter, comprising: providing a first stage thatreceives an input DC voltage, the first stage comprising first, second,third, and fourth switches connected together in series between thefirst and second input terminals, a first flying capacitor connected inparallel with the second and third switches, and a first stage outputpoint between the second and third switches; providing a second stageconnected to the first stage output point, the second stage comprisingfirst and second cells connected together in parallel, wherein each cellcomprises first, second, third, and fourth switches connected togetherin series between an input terminal and a circuit common point, a flyingcapacitor connected in parallel with the second and third switches, andan output point between the second and third switches; controlling theswitches of the first and second stages, wherein a switching frequencyprovided to the second stage switches is half a switching frequencyprovided to the first stage switches; wherein an output voltage of theDC-DC converter is about 0.25× the input voltage.
 13. The method ofclaim 12, wherein first stage switching signals provided to the firstand third switches are 180 degrees out of phase with switching signalsprovided to the second and fourth switches; and for each of the firstand second cells, switching signals provided to first and third switchesare 180 degrees out of phase with switching signals provided to thesecond and fourth switches; and the first and second cells are operated180 degrees out of phase with each other.
 14. The method of claim 12,comprising providing a third stage connected to the output points of thecells of the second stage; wherein the third stage comprises four cellsconnected together in parallel, and each cell comprises first, second,third, and fourth switches connected together in series between an inputterminal and a circuit common point, a flying capacitor connected inparallel with the second and third switches, and an output point betweenthe second and third switches; controlling the switches of the first,second, and third stages, wherein a switching frequency provided to thethird stage switches is half the switching frequency provided to thesecond stage switches, and the switching frequency provided to thesecond stage switches is half the switching frequency provided to thefirst stage switches; wherein an output voltage of the DC-DC converteris about 0.125× the input voltage.
 15. The method of claim 12,comprising implementing the DC-DC converter with n output stages;wherein each subsequent stage provides an additional 2:1 stepdown ratio,includes twice as many cells as a previous stage, and operates at halfthe switching frequency of a previous stage; wherein a stepdown ratio of2^(n):1 is provided.
 16. The method of claim 12, wherein the converteris implemented in a power supply architecture with point of load (POL)voltage conversion.
 17. The method of claim 12, wherein the input DCvoltage is about 48 V.